Skip to main content

Web Content Display Web Content Display

Skip banner

Nested Portlets Nested Portlets

Web Content Display Web Content Display

Center for Data Analysis CANDY
—the research excellence initiative at the Faculty of Philosophy
Contact: Maciej Koniewski, PhD, maciej.koniewski@uj.edu.pl

CANDY provides support and expert knowledge in the field of research planning and data analysis to employees and PhD students of the JU, in particular, but not exclusively, working in the social sciences. We consult individual research and analytical projects, cooperate with research teams, plan, coordinate and conduct teaching. We help in the preparation of grant applications, pre-registration of research, and scientific publications. The scope of our expertise is wide; includes research design, development of data analysis plans, organization and preparation of data for analysis, development of computer codes for data processing and analysis, advanced statistical analysis, causal inference, predictive modeling, text analysis, data visualization, and much more.

We are a group of consultants  employees of the JU and external experts who use advanced methods of data analysis in their research and teaching. Our team is informal, with a changing composition and always open to new collaborators. It is a group focused around common interests – advanced methods of data analysis and a common goal – to cultivate the highest methodological standards; focused on stimulating and deepening of our knowledge in this field and sharing it with the academic community. Thus, the Center responds to the need for the proper use of data analysis, especially in the social sciences, to enhance research and teaching excellence in the area of analysis and methodology.

  1. The consultations are free of charge.
  2. The work of consultants is financed by funds administered by the JU.
  3. Consultations are available first to academics employed at the JU as their main workplace, who conducts research; to doctoral students if resources allow.
  4. Consultation may cover any stage of the study from planning, through data collection, organization, analysis, results interpretation and presentation.
  5. Consultation is supportive, collaborative, and requires involvement, the consultation should have an educational value. Consultation should not be regarded as a service.
  6. Consultations can be in the form of a one-time meeting, conversation or longer cooperation, including independent work of the consultant on the consulted issue.
  7. Consultations are dedicated to individuals and teams who are working on a grant proposal, a scientific article, a monograph.
  8. Consultations are conducted on a 1:1 basis or in small groups.
  9. Consultations are held at consultant’s workplace or remotely.
  10. All conversations and consultations are covered by the rule of confidentiality.
  11. Consultations cannot be recorded.
  12. The scope and time of the consultation after its completion are reported in the consultation form, which is unanimously signed by the consultant and the consulted person.
  13. The contribution of the consultant is included in the publications. The consultant shall agree with the consulted person on the form of authorship attribution, e.g. co-authorship, acknowledgment, authorship of a chapter, which shall be noted in the consultation form.
  14. The consultant and the consulted person are obliged to adhere to the principles of research ethics and the ethics of the academic teacher.
  15. Issues not regulated here are determined each time by the consultant and the consulted person, which should be noted in the consultation form.

For those interested in consultation, please contact: maciej.koniewski@uj.edu.pl

The form is completed by the consultant:
 https://bit.ly/formularz_konsultacji

Web Content Display Web Content Display

Under leading role of pharmacologists Natalia Malikowska-Racia and Piotr Popik from the Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences we contributed to the article published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology. The goal of the study was to examine whether the treatment with psilocybin and/or LSD would demonstrate immediate and/or sustained antidepressant-like effects in the differential reinforcement of low-rate responding schedule in rats. It turned out that treatment with psilocybin but not LSD demonstrated an immediate antidepressant-like effect. By contrast, neither of the drugs showed a long-term (up to 4 weeks following administration) antidepressant-like effect. Check out the graphs --which communicate study results-- developed in Stata of (a) margins and (b) coefficients from the multilevel mixed-effects linear regression. Read and share: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/02698811231205692
 

New publication on treatment of the patients with advanced breast cancer titled “Metronomic Chemo-Endocrine Therapy (FulVEC) as a Salvage Treatment for Patients with Advanced, Treatment-Refractory ER+/HER2-Breast Cancer—A Retrospective Analysis of Consecutive Patients Data” has been published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine. The article is a product of collaboration with the Department of Oncology, Jagiellonian University Medical College. Read and share: https://lnkd.in/d3XAV8Wh

Our collab with social psychologists Katarzyna Jamróz-Dolińska and Maciej Sekerdej from the Institute of Psychology has resulted in publication titled “Increase in the preference for civic over ethnic nationalism among Poles: The impact of representations of a multiethnic past on the perceived inclusiveness of the nation”. It has been published recently in the International Journal of Intercultural Relations. Our findings demonstrate how nations may benefit from utilising some parts of their history to promote inclusiveness. Read and share: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101773

New publication in European Journal of Ageing titled “Measuring relatives’ perceptions of end‑of‑life communication with physicians in five countries: a psychometric analysis” was published by CANDY consultant as a lead author. The article uses the state-of-the-art psychometrics to test the Family Perceptions of Physician-Family Caregiver Communication scale’s unidimensionality and reliability. Read and share: https://rdcu.be/cZye0


Up to one fourth of a variance in rulings (sentencing disparities among different courts) could be attributed to the specifics of courts (most likely judges’ subjectivism) and not solely the crime case specifics or characteristics of the charged person. This is selected finding from the paper published in European Journal of Criminology, titled “A failed attempt to radically reduce inter-court sentencing disparities by legislation: Empirical evidence from Poland”, which resulted from our cooperation with Kamil Mamak, Joanna Dudek, and Daniel Kwiatkowski from Faculty of Law and Administration. Read and share: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820952729